|
Problem/Solution
1: The writer uses "this week's …tutorial" in two successive sentences.
Don't
do that! Problem/Solution 2: The writer uses a dash instead of a
comma to set off a simple introductory adverbial phrase. Don't do
that!
WD Says: "It's
critical that your writing is the best it can be before you submit to any
editor or agent. After watching to How to Become a Ferocious Self-Editor,
you will have countless ideas on how to better your own writing."
Problem/Solution
1: The writer fails to discern between "…submit to any editor or agent"
and what should have been written, which is "…submit
it to any editor or agent." The
two do not have identical meanings, if you get the sting of my whip.
Problem/Solution 2: "After watching to How to Become a Ferocious Self-Editor" has, of course,
an extraneous "to" as the third word, and the "to" in the title should be
capitalized, as it is not a preposition but an infinitive; and the "t" in
"to" is always capitalized when it's part of an infinitive phrase.
WD Says: "Example:
He squinted his eyes as he looked up into the sky.
"Ask yourself: What can be taken out of this
sentence?
"Answer: First, what else but his eyes would he
squint? Second, we all know the sky is up, why state that?
Quick re-write: He squinted as he looked into the
sky."
Problem/Solution:
Still awkward and wordy. A much stronger edit would be, "He looked up and
squinted." Game, set, match!
Now, I know everyone has bad days. But whoever
wrote this (and let's hope it wasn't the person actually teaching the
tutorial!) should have stayed in bed another couple of weeks. It's
one thing to make mistakes in your writing, even when you're writing about
correcting the mistakes in your writing. It's something totally different
to make mistakes in a promotional piece advocating that people pay money
(oh, did I forget to mention that part of it?)--and a good chunk of
change, at that--and literally take their chances. How sad.
Unfortunately, the world is filled with bad
writing. It's also pretty jam-packed with mediocre writing. I see
writers creating work that constantly
falls short of the mark, only because they failed to be their own
toughest editors. Perhaps that's because they think everything they write
is perfect. Perhaps they don't know how a good writer's work should
sound. Perhaps they simply don't know enough about editing to be a tough
self-editor.
Whatever the reason, these writers are destined to
fail. Their work will never be
published because it will never be good enough. Oh, sure, they can hire a
professional editor to help them prepare their manuscript for shopping
around; and you would be surprised at how many writers do just that. But
they are the fortunate ones--first, to have enough funds to indulge in
what many writers might consider a luxury; second, to have found an editor
of high enough caliber to help them get their works into print.
I'm all for writers learning to write well by
learning to edit other writers' works. That's where a stint in journalism
school or a good series of writer's workshops or even jobs as reporters,
editors, and proofreaders for the local newspaper come in handy. If your
writing needs some serious editing and you're not up to the task--and,
worse, you can't afford someone who is--you're going to have to learn to
be a better writer. One way or another.
Remember what playwright and poet Richard Sheridan
once wrote:
You write with ease to show your breeding,
But easy writing's vile hard reading.
So, unless you learn to kick the "easy writing"
habit out of your life once and for all, you're going to have to get used
to failure.
In the meantime...
Smoke if you got 'em.
|