by D. J. Herda
Everybody loves a
good fight. Except when a political-debate moderator steps in and
engages in anything but. And then everybody hates a bad
fight.
Journalism--and, by
way of extension, journalists--should be objective. Their goal
should be to lay out the story; present the facts; and let the chips fall
where they may. In the second presidential debate on Tuesday,
October 16, CNN commentator and presidential debate moderator Candy
Crowley did anything but.
And I hated the
results.
Did Obama "win"?
Did Romney?
Who knows! Ms.
Crowley was so busy failing in her appointed tasks that no one will
ever know. How can a moderator announce, after the rules of the
debate have been set in stone and accepted by both parties, that she won't
abide by them? How can a moderator inject her personality so that
she appears to have a one-on-one relationship with the debaters? How
can a moderator shamefully neglect to hold the debaters accountable for
infractions of the "rules" of the debate? How can she fail to
enforce them?
More shockingly, how
can a moderator inject her personal interpretation (and wrongly, at that)
of a statement the president made regarding whether or not he said the day
after the attacks that the Libyan murders on American soil actually
were "terrorist attacks"? (Obama sent out his press secretary,
Jay Carney, his ambassador, Susan Rice, his secretary of state, Hillary
Clinton, and his former press secretary, Robert Gibbs, to claim the
contrary of what he insisted in the debate within hours of the murders.)
To her credit, Crowley came out moments after the debate and said she had
made a mistake in saying what she had. To her everlasting shame,
she said the next day that "Romney" was somehow to blame for eliciting her
comments by not having phrased his language clearly enough.
I hate poor journalism. That's because, I suppose, I was trained
not to fall into that trap. I was trained, at the college level, by
professional working journalists at the Chicago Tribune and the
Chicago Sun-Times and WGN-TV and at other media outlets how to be a
responsible journalist.
In thinking back, I recall a guest journalist brought into our Columbia
College class from
the Israel News to lecture us on the dangers of suppositions.
He asked every one of us to answer a simple question. "Who presently
occupies Jerusalem?"
We answered to a man (well, to a kid), "The Jews."
He smiled, told us what good intentions we had, and how wrong we were.
"Jews," he said, "are followers of the faith of Judaism. Israelis
are the occupants of the Jewish State called Israel."
He went on to say that not all Israelis are Jews, and not all Jews are
Israelis. Therefore, it is Israelis, and not Jews, who are
the occupants of Israel.
"Do you see how easy it is to mislead the public by failing to do your
journalistic research?"
I did. And I do.
And I wish Candy Crowley did likewise.
But she doesn't. And she won't. And that's the sad state of
affairs to which this nation's once-venerable Fourth Estate has sunk.
And I...am D. J. Herda
# #
#
The American Society of
Authors and Writers (http://amsaw.org)
is an organization made up of authors, writers, editors, publishers,
agents, directors, producers, and other media professionals who rely upon
the printed word in the creation of quality literature and entertainment.
Copyright 2012. All rights reserved.